Ratios and proportions

Calculate ratios without guessing the next step

Choose whether to simplify, compare, scale, or find a missing term. Enter each part in its own field to see the resulting ratio and why it is equivalent, or why it is not.

Choose a ratio task and enter each part

Integers, finite decimals, and simple fractions are accepted. Ratio denominators must be nonzero.

The ratio simplifies to 3:4

18:24=3:418:24=3:4
Conditions
  • The first part is 18 and the second part is 24; their order is preserved.
  • The second part is nonzero, so the ratio can also be compared as a fraction.

Steps

  1. Find a common factor The greatest common divisor of 18 and 24 is 6.gcd(18,24)=6\gcd(18,24)=6
  2. Divide both parts Apply the same nonzero divisor to the first and second part.18÷6=3,24÷6=418\div6=3,\qquad24\div6=4
  3. Keep the original order The first-to-second comparison remains three to four.18:24=3:418:24=3:4
Independent check

Cross-multiplication gives 18×4=72 and 24×3=72, independently checking that the two defined ratios are equivalent.

What this ratio calculation covers

A ratio a:b compares two quantities in a stated order. To simplify, divide both parts by the same nonzero factor. Two defined ratios a:b and c:d are equivalent when ad=bc. Scaling both parts by a nonzero factor preserves the comparison.

Simplify without reversing the parts

Reduce integer or rational entries by one common nonzero factor. The displayed order stays first part to second part; it is not converted to a mixed number.

Examples: 18:24 becomes 3:4, 1/2:3/4 becomes 2:3

Compare equivalent ratios

Test whether two defined ratios make the same comparison by checking cross-products, then name the result instead of relying on rounded decimals.

Examples: 2:3 and 8:12 are equivalent, 2:3 and 3:5 are not

Scale and build an equivalent-ratio row

Multiply both parts by the same nonzero rational factor. Repeat with another factor to extend an equivalent-ratio table.

Examples: 3:5, 6:10, 12:20, 4:7 scaled by 3

Solve one missing proportional part

In a:b=c:d, leave exactly one part unknown. Solve by cross-products only when both denominator positions are valid.

Examples: 3:4=x:20, 5:8=15:x

Enter enough information for one clear task

  1. 1
    Choose what you need

    Simplify uses one pair. Compare uses two complete pairs. Scale uses one pair and a factor. Find a missing part uses a proportion with exactly one empty field.

  2. 2
    Enter values in separate fields

    The left field is the first part of a ratio. The right field is the second. Keep units consistent when the pair represents quantities of the same kind.

  3. 3
    Read the equivalence check

    For a proportion, compare cross-products; for scaling, check that both parts changed by the same factor. A missing or zero denominator is not silently ignored.

Examples to try

Use these examples to recognize the method, compare equivalent forms, and check your own work.

Simplify whole-number parts

Divide both numbers by their greatest common divisor, 6.

18:2418:24

Expected result

3:43:4

Clear fractional parts exactly

Multiply both parts by 4, then reduce 2:3 if necessary.

12:34\frac12:\frac34

Expected result

2:32:3

Check whether two ratios match

Compare the cross-products 2×12 and 3×8.

2:3and8:122:3\quad\text{and}\quad8:12

Expected result

212=38=242\cdot12=3\cdot8=24

Make a short ratio table

Multiply both entries by each nonzero scale factor.

3:5scaled by1,2,43:5\quad\text{scaled by}\quad1,2,4

Expected result

3:5=6:10=12:203:5=6:10=12:20

Find the first missing part

The second part was multiplied by 5, so multiply the first part by 5 too.

3:4=x:203:4=x:20

Expected result

x=15x=15

Find the second missing part

Cross-multiply: 5x=8×15.

5:8=15:x5:8=15:x

Expected result

x=24x=24

Keep a zero first part

A zero numerator is allowed when the second part is nonzero.

0:90:9

Expected result

0:10:1

Scale a recipe ratio to a new batch

The original and new pairs must use the same order and units. Let f be the flour amount in the larger batch.

Flour : oats=3:5,oats=20 cups\text{Flour : oats}=3:5,\qquad\text{oats}=20\text{ cups}
  1. 1
    Set matching parts beside each other

    Flour stays first, oats stays second; only the new flour part is missing.

    3:5=f:203:5=f:20
  2. 2
    Find the scale factor

    The oats amount changes from 5 cups to 20 cups, a factor of 4.

    20÷5=420\div5=4
  3. 3
    Apply it to the other part

    The flour amount must be multiplied by the same factor.

    f=34=12f=3\cdot4=12
Flour=12 cups\text{Flour}=12\text{ cups}

Verification: The original fraction is 3/5 and the new fraction is 12/20; cross-products are both 60.

Common mistakes and how to fix them

Reversing one ratio

Problem: Compare flour:oats with oats:flour as though they were in the same order.

Why it matters: Reversing only one pair changes the comparison, so the cross-products no longer represent the intended proportion.

Better approach: Label the quantities once and keep the order consistent in every pair.

Changing only one part

Problem: Turn 3:5 into 3:20 by multiplying only the second part.

Why it matters: The ratio changes because the parts no longer have the same common multiplier.

Better approach: Multiply or divide both parts by the same nonzero value.

Dividing by a zero second part

Problem: Treat 4:0 as the fraction 4/0 or solve a proportion with a zero denominator.

Why it matters: Division by zero is undefined; ordinary fraction-based proportion rules do not apply.

Better approach: Correct the second part or express a different mathematical comparison with explicit assumptions.

Rounding too early

Problem: Round 1/3 to 0.33 before testing equivalence.

Why it matters: A rounded decimal can make equal ratios look unequal, or unequal ratios look close enough.

Better approach: Keep exact rational values through the cross-product check.

Checks, assumptions, and limits

How results are checked

  • For defined ratios, cross-products are compared using exact rational arithmetic.
  • Simplification is checked by reconstructing the original comparison from the reduced pair.
  • A missing proportional term is substituted back into the original equality.
  • Scaling confirms that the same nonzero factor was applied to both parts.

When to stop and revise the input

  • Inputs are finite integers, finite decimals, or simple fractions; decimals are interpreted as exact written rational values.
  • A second part of zero cannot be used as the denominator of an ordinary ratio or proportion.
  • A proportion with more than one missing part does not determine a unique answer.
  • Negative values can be compared algebraically, but a real-world part-to-part interpretation may require nonnegative quantities and compatible units.

Calculate ratios without guessing the next step FAQ

How do I simplify a ratio?

Divide both parts by a common nonzero factor. For 18:24, dividing both by 6 gives 3:4. Keep the same first-to-second order.

How can I tell whether two ratios are equivalent?

For defined ratios a:b and c:d with nonzero second parts, compare a×d with b×c. Equality means the fractions a/b and c/d have the same value.

What does a ratio table show?

Each row is made by multiplying both parts of a starting ratio by one nonzero factor. Starting from 3:5, factors 1, 2, and 4 give 3:5, 6:10, and 12:20.

Can a ratio have a zero part?

A zero first part and nonzero second part is valid, such as 0:9=0:1. A zero second part cannot be treated as a fraction denominator; 0:0 has no defined proportional comparison.

Is a ratio the same as a rate?

Both compare quantities through division, but a rate usually compares quantities with different units, such as miles per hour. Include units and their order when interpreting a rate.

Sources and curriculum alignment

This page follows standard introductory mathematics notation and learning sequences. Use these references to continue with a complete course treatment.

Choose the resource that matches what you need to do next.

Created by Mathos AI. Methods, conditions, and checks are shown so you can review the mathematical reasoning.